Using Multiple Coulomb Scattering for Particle Identification in Neutrino Experiments

Ben Matthews, Middlebury College, Physics Major

Mentored by Dr. Glenn Horton-Smith

Neutrinos are being studied in experiments like MicroBooNE and DUNE by sending vast amounts of neutrinos into tanks of liquid argon and observing the interactions which take place. In many of these interactions, a proton or muon is produced during the collision which creates a reproducible track as it moves through the tank. Analyzing the trajectory of the proton or muon provides essential information for reconstructing the collision and learning about neutrinos. However, these particles frequently exit the liquid argon detector, which makes it harder to reconstruct particle momentums and to identify protons from muons. This project explored the potential of using multiple coulomb scattering (MCS) on exiting tracks to determine particle momentum and identity.

A charged particle's track is segmented and best fit lines are drawn through each segment. The projected angle between segments lies on a momentum-dependent gaussian distribution. [1]

Fig 1. A charged particle's track is segmented and best fit lines are drawn through each segment. The projected angle between segments lies on a momentum-dependent gaussian distribution. [1]

Charged particles undergo coulombic scattering in liquid argon which cause slight variations in the otherwise straight path of the particle. Segmenting particle tracks and fitting lines through each segment gives a gaussian distribution of the angle between adjacent segment fit lines, predicted by the Highland formula. The expected scattering angle between segments is momentum-dependent, which allows a particle's momentum to be found using a maximum likelihood method. The success of this momentum reconstruction shown in Fig. 2 validates the use of MCS using a simulated particle's true position data.

Momentum values calculated using multiple coulomb scattering are plotted against true momentum values.

Fig 2. Momentum values calculated using multiple coulomb scattering are plotted against true momentum values.

Protons are significantly more massive than muons, meaning their expected scattering angles given by the Highland formula differ greatly from muons. This makes it possible to apply a maximum likelihood method for particle identification as well as momentum reconstruction. For muons, this method successfully identifies the particle almost every time. However, protons are harder to identify, since non-coulombic interactions with argon nuclei affect their scattering angles.

A histogram showing the difference in negative log-likelihoods for protons and muons. For true muons, a higher likelihood is expected, which corresponds to a lower negative log-likelihood. Since all points are greater than 0, all muons were correctly identified.Fig 3. A histogram showing the difference in negative log-likelihoods for protons and muons. For true muons, a higher likelihood is expected, which corresponds to a lower negative log-likelihood. Since all points are greater than 0, all muons were correctly identified.

A histogram showing the difference in negative log-likelihoods for protons and muons. For true protons, a higher likelihood is expected, which corresponds to a lower negative log-likelihood. The distribution is centered around 0, suggesting that multiple coulomb scattering is not sufficient to identify protons from muons due to non-coulombic interactions by the protons.

Fig 4. A histogram showing the difference in negative log-likelihoods for protons and muons. For true protons, a higher likelihood is expected, which corresponds to a lower negative log-likelihood. The distribution is centered around 0, suggesting that multiple coulomb scattering is not sufficient to identify protons from muons due to non-coulombic interactions by the protons.

Applying the MCS method to a particle's reconstructed position data, instead of truth data, is the next step in using MCS in neutrino experiments. Comparing the scattering in the XZ and YZ planes for truth and reconstructed position data reveals detector effects which are anisotropically distorting scattering effects.

Caption for 5-8: Normalized scattering angles in the XZ and YZ planes using truth data (top) and reconstructed data (bottom) are shown. The distributions using truth data have a standard deviation near the expected value of 1, while the distributions with reconstructed data are well below 1 and unequal, showing directional detector effects on the position data.

Fig 5.

Caption for 5-8: Normalized scattering angles in the XZ and YZ planes using truth data (top) and reconstructed data (bottom) are shown. The distributions using truth data have a standard deviation near the expected value of 1, while the distributions with reconstructed data are well below 1 and unequal, showing directional detector effects on the position data.

Fig 6.

Caption for 5-8: Normalized scattering angles in the XZ and YZ planes using truth data (top) and reconstructed data (bottom) are shown. The distributions using truth data have a standard deviation near the expected value of 1, while the distributions with reconstructed data are well below 1 and unequal, showing directional detector effects on the position data.

Fig 7.

Caption for 5-8: Normalized scattering angles in the XZ and YZ planes using truth data (top) and reconstructed data (bottom) are shown. The distributions using truth data have a standard deviation near the expected value of 1, while the distributions with reconstructed data are well below 1 and unequal, showing directional detector effects on the position data.

Fig 8.
Figs 5-8. Normalized scattering angles in the XZ and YZ planes using truth data (top) and reconstructed data (bottom) are shown. The distributions using truth data have a standard deviation near the expected value of 1, while the distributions with reconstructed data are well below 1 and unequal, showing directional detector effects on the position data.

Appropriate use of MCS in neutrino experiments requires that these detector effects be identified and mitigated. Afterwards, identification of non-coulombic proton scattering could be used to more accurately predict proton scattering angles, and ultimately allow exiting protons and muons to be distinguished.

References

[1] P. Abratenko et al [MicroBooNE collaboration] Determination of muon momentum in the MicroBooNE LArTPC using an improved model of multiple Coulomb scattering 2017 JINST 12 P10010 https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.06187

Acknowledgments

Glenn Horton-Smith

Tim Bolton

National Science Foundation Grant PHY-1757778

Kansas State University

Final Presentation