Teaching University Physics
PHYS 620
Kansas State University
Course Schedule
FALL 1996
PHYS 620 is a 3-credit class which is open to all
upper level undergraduates and graduate students in physics or
science education. It was first offered in the Fall, 1996.
Instructor: Dean Zollman
Students:
1 Senior undergraduate physics major
1 Science Education graduate student
4 Physics Education graduate students
2 Atomic Physics graduate students
1 Physics Education post-doc
Schedule of Events
A teaching-learning example (Two days)
- Students participate in an example of a physics
class which uses interactive technology and teaching-learning
methods based on contemporary physics education research. The
class uses interactive video and the ClassTalk response system
to determine the latent heat of fusion of the wicked Witch of
the West in the Wizard of Oz Emphasis is placed on student
interactions, concrete examples and student conceptions.
- We then discussed this approach to learning with
an emphasis on how it is different from the students' experiences,
what they found valuable in this approach, and what troubles them.
- From this discussion we generated a list of questions
which are related to physics education. These questions will
be addressed through out the semester.
Phase I : Science Teaching & Intellectual
Development (Five Weeks)
- Students worked through the Workshop on Physics
Teaching & the Development of Reasoning. This Workshop
was originally developed for AAPT by Karplus, et al. In the 1970s.
It has been modified by Fuller for the ADAPT Program. Fuller's
version was modified for this class by Zollman.
- We looked at implementations of the Learning
Cycle and other similar learning strategies. The class read and
discussed papers on: Concepts of Physics class, Modeling Cycle,
Workshop Physics, Studio Physics (CUPLE). We also looked at some
software and discussed its use in this style of teaching-learning
Phase II: Conceptual Reasoning & How it is
Measured (Two Weeks)
- We discussed conceptual learning. The students
completed the Force Concept Inventory and then discussed the FCI
related papers by Halloun & Hestenes.
- We read and discussed the exchange between Halloun
- Hestenes and Heller - Huffman.
- A draft of Richard Hake's paper on teaching approaches
and performance on the FCI concluded this phase of the class.
Phase III: Student Attitudes toward Physics (Three
Weeks)
- We read and discussed They're not dumb, they're
different by Tobias.
- Read and discuss Seymour's papers about why students
drop out of science and engineering.
- A short discussion of Hudson's work on introductory
courses and the math preparation of students.
Phase IV: Applying Research to Physics Teaching
(Three Weeks)
- Zollman described the Contemporary Physics course
for future teachers. The teaching-learning style of this course
was discussed in light of the materials study so far. The Students
were asked to review a textbook and determine its appropriateness
for the Contemporary Physics course. (Based on the students'
recommendations the book was not adopted.). Van Heuvelen's review
of research-based instructional strategies was also discussed.
- Discussion of McDermott's
Millikan Lecture (1990) Working in groups the students used her
ideas to design and execute a lesson on the Atwood's Machine.
After they had critiqued each others' approaches we read the
paper on teaching strategies for the the Atwood's Machine by
McDermott et al.
- We viewed discussed Eric Mazur's recent satellite
video "conference" and paper on interactions in large
classes.
- Critique of a software package which has been
submitted for publication to Physics Academic Software.
- Discussion and critique of parts of the Quantum
Tunneling unit which is under development by the KSU Physics Education
Group in the context of the ideas discussed in the course.
- Return to the list of questions generated during
the first week of classes and discuss which ones have been addressed
(not necessarily answered) by the semester's work.
- Complete student feedback forms and have a short
discussion of the value of such forms.