Rotating Pulsed Magnetic Field Design and a Pulsed Field Study of Nanoparticle Phase Dynamics
by John N. Moore
supervisor: Dr. Viktor Chikan
Kansas State University Physics Department REU Program
This program is
funded by the National Science Foundation through grant number PHY-1157044. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations
expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily
reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Introduction
to Project 1: When nanoscale magnetic particles are
delivered near tumor sites there are two mechanisms by which they can destroy
cancerous cells. The first, called
magnetic hyperthermia, results when the nanoparticles absorb energy via
relaxation of their magnetic moments in the presence of an alternating magnetic
field. The temperature increase caused
by these relaxations is sufficient to kill surrounding cancerous cells (~44°C),
however, until nanoparticle relaxation is better understood in biological
systems the particle concentrations required for effective treatment (~5 mg/cm3)
are not without unhealthy side effects.
An alternative to magnetic hyperthermia would be to cut through the
cancer cell membranes using the mechanical motion of nanoparticles. If rod-shaped nanoparticles are placed in a
rapidly rotating magnetic field they will maintain their alignment with the
field and spin like miniature drills.
Using this method it would be possible to destroy cancer tissue at much
lower particle concentrations than used for a heating method.
Unfortunately
magnetic nanorods are still challenging to synthesize, and the rotating
magnetic fields that one would use to study such nanorods are difficult to
generate. I spent about seven weeks
working to build a high-voltage experimental setup capable of producing a pulsed
field that rotates in a single plane.
The setup when complete will be useful for a host of optical experiments
including measurements of Faraday rotation and Cotton-Mouton coefficients which
provide important information about the magnetic environment of nanoparticle
suspensions. Beyond nanoparticle magnetism, a rotating magnetic field might also be used
to create molecules with dynamic chirality and materials with a negative
refractive index.
A nested Helmholtz coil arrangement is used with the coil axes oriented
perpendicular to each other. As the
magnetic field produced by each coil adds as a linear combination, a
resultant field can be produced in any direction within the plane of the
coil axes.
To ensure that all of the nanorods in a solution are aligning with
the magnetic field, fields on the order of a couple tesla are ideal. To achieve such fields, a pulsed RLC
circuit is used. One branch of the
circuit made up of a capacitor, inductor, and a resistor is shown
here. After the capacitor is charged
up to a voltage anywhere between 1kV and 10kV, a spark ionizes the gas
between two electrodes, closing the circuit and allowing the capacitor to
discharge through the Helmholtz coil.
The current pulse resulting from the above circuit is modeled as an
under-damped sign wave (left). When
one of these pulses is shifted by a phase of
with respect to the other, the resultant
field traces out an ellipse in space as it decays (right).
A major challenge is to reliably fire the capacitors with the correct
phase delay. In our experiment this
phase is about 21 microseconds. One
spark gap the we use to give precise triggering of the pulse is a
pressurized cavity that can be filled with either helium, argon, or air
depending on the desired dielectric constant (left and bottom right). The spark comes from a box which receives
an input signal from a timing box (bottom left). The timing box sends two output signals
with delays that can be programmed with nanosecond precision.
Introduction
to Project 2:
During my last three weeks I
studied the Faraday rotation of nanoparticle solutions using a different
experimental setup which delivered a pulsed magnetic field of up to around 3.5
tesla. Faraday rotation is observed as
the rotation of light’s axis of polarization as it propagates through a medium
in which a magnetic field is present along the direction of propagation. The angle of rotation is given as the product
of the magnetic field strength, the optical path length, and a material
specific constant called the Verdet constant.
Materials with a large Verdet constant are useful in the design of
optical isolators, magneto-optic modulators and switches, and magnetic field
sensors. These devices in their
conventional bulk forms usually rely on materials like garnet crystals for
their large rotations and fast response times, but as optical components
continue to be miniaturized for applications to integrated optical systems,
more compact designs demand new materials.
Nanoparticle composites, because of their scalability and potential to
deliver exceptionally large magneto-optic rotations, are a viable solution.
One limitation of the magneto-optic devices mentioned is the time that
it takes the magnetic moments inside the material to respond to the external
field. This can be seen our experiment
as a delay in the Faraday rotation signal peaks with respect to the peaks in
the pulsed field. Studying how these
delays depend on factors such as the magnitude of the field, the duration of
the pulse, and the concentration of the nanoparticle solution, we can gain a
better understanding of nanoparticle dynamics and some the interactions that
give rise to longer relaxation times in these solutions. Further, we may see that the puled field in
out experiment can offer more useful information related to phase than a more
conventional AC field technique.
Faraday
rotation is observed as the rotation of light’s axis of polarization as it
propagates through a medium in which a magnetic field is present along the
direction of propagation. The angle
of rotation is given as the product of the magnetic field strength (B), the optical path length (d), and a material specific constant
called the Verdet constant (
).
When the
magnetic field pulse and Faraday rotation pulse are plotted together there
are several points at which both the field and the rotation go to
zero. At ten of these intersections
I measured the relative delay of the rotation signal with respect to the
field signal. I averaged these
phases over three pulse captures to help cancel statistical variations, then
I plotted the phase against the intersection number for five different
concentrations of nanoparticle solution.
This plot shows the phase decreasing over the duration of a
pulse. The phase delay of each
concentration averaged over the duration of a pulse shows a trend of
increasing phase with increasing concentration.
Links: