Project Overview
Alex George
Neutrinos
and anti-neutrinos are among the most interesting topics in physics. They are everywhere – the sun, cosmic rays,
and even nuclear power plants produce billions upon billions of these each
minute. Yet, they almost never interact
with matter. They are uncharged, so they
do not interact electromagnetically.
There are no known strong interactions.
They are so light (until very recently, it was postulated that they were
massless) that they have no real interaction
gravitationally. In fact, the only known
interaction with anything else is via the weak nuclear force: other things
decay into neutrinos.
There are
three types of neutrinos: the electron neutrino, the muon
neutrino, and the tau neutrino. The
electron neutrino is tiny even by atomic standards: it is no greater than
approximately four one-millionths the mass of the electron. The muon neutrino
is probably less than 2/5 the mass of an electron, while the tau neutrino might
be as much as thirty times the electron mass.
Detectors
for these neutrinos have been built, and there was immediately a
“problem.” Solar structure is well
understood, so the expected neutrino flux is known with relatively little
uncertainty. However, the measured
neutrino flux was about one-third of what it should be. Many explanations were proposed, the most
likely of which involves neutrino “oscillations” – that
neutrinos can oscillate from being muon neutrinos to
being tau neutrinos to being electron neutrinos as they move.
Experiments
to test this (or any high-energy) process are very expensive, so they are
carried out internationally, with hundreds of physicists needed to collaborate
on each one. The KamLAND
process, at the Superkamiokande facility in Japan,
was set up to measure the mixing angle and the change in mass of the particle,
to see what could explain these oscillations.
That experiment was successful; oscillations are now understood. KamLAND is now
shifting an emphasis on creating an “ultralow background,” free from noise,
that can be used to measure neutrinos created at the sun, which will have a
much lower energy than those neutrinos originally measured, which were created
at a power plant quite nearby.
The other
project that the collaboration is working on is Double Chooz,
in France, which could simply be described as a search for the mixing angle
between electron and tau neutrinos. It
is believed that neutrinos are not always in a definitive state (where they
would self-identify as an electron or tau neutrino), but might also be in some
linear combination of those states, where they would truly be a combination of
both simultaneously. But what is the
ratio? Are neutrinos usually 99%
electron and 1% tau, or are they 50% electron and 50% tau? That’s the (primary) goal of Double Chooz.
But while
these experiments are very important, our goal will always be to understand the
physics well enough so that what happens on paper is exactly what happens in real life.
These experiments have so many variables that they don’t normally happen
on paper, but rather as the result of some very complicated software, based on c++.
So at last
I can define my project. I will be
working with the c++ simulations, and the software,
to predict what “should” happen in the reactors in Japan and France, if our
understanding of neutrino structure is correct.
We can then compare this to what actually happens, so we know how to
adjust our theories, should there be differences.
For me,
this project has two components:
·
Run simulations in Geant 4,
a c++-based programming language, that will allow me
to understand, describe, and report on the effect of “spill-in/spill-out” – the
chance that a particle created outside the detector would capture on the
gadolinium inside it, or alternative that a particle created inside the
detector would capture on the hydrogen outside the detector.
·
Go to KamLAND, the project
in Japan, to take data there and ensure that the reactor does not
malfunction.